J.A.I.L. News
Journal
______________________________________________________
Los Angeles,
California
November 22, 2006
______________________________________________________
The Inherent Right of ALL People to
Alter or Reform Government.
The Right Upon Which All Other
Rights Depend
Decisions, Decisions,
Decisions!
Along with "judicial
independence" a word so frequently ranted in the No-on-E campaign against South
Dakota J.A.I.L. was "decisions" --basically three kinds:
-
decisions we don't
like (the "classic" one)
-
decisions made as
official decision-making
-
decisions that are
unpopular
And what do they
all have in common, other than "decisions"?
NONE OF THEM HAS TO DO WITH
J.A.I.L.
The propaganda about
"decisions" is the headline-fraud bombasted to the public about J.A.I.L.
because it is the lie that will have the most emotional affect on people, to
wit, "J.A.I.L. will allow people to sue judges for decisions they don't
like"
[now, that's a
classic! --that'll get 'em every time! --watch for it at the next
election!] and various perversions of it, "sue judges for unpopular
decisions," or "sue judges for their official decision-making." This
propaganda has been successfully carried out, despite the fact that
nowhere does the J.A.I.L. Amendment state, or even
imply, such a ridiculous proposition. But people gobble it up like chocolate
pudding! The opposition relies on the gullibility of the People, stating that
"despite what the proponents of the amendment state, or what the amendment
itself states, they really mean... " No matter if the sky looks blue, it's
REALLY bright red, full of blood, and it's FALLING! Stay away from it!
(Yes folks, it's that ridiculous!)
This is the same
pattern that the enemy, usually the legal fraternity, uses when defending
government against a pro-se plaintiff. "Despite what plaintiff states in his
complaint, what really happened is... " "...what he really means is
..." They are able to come in with propaganda in the courtroom,
submitting another and different "complaint" (their version) rather than a defense to
plaintiff's complaint; and the judge invariably uses the defendant's set of
facts as the controlling facts of the case. Defendant's statement of the
case is (as are all defense documents) the
script followed by the judge as to how he should rule and what he publishes as
the facts of the case in a published decision, so the public reads a
distorted version of the plaintiff's case, twisted and perverted to conform to
the desired result against the plaintiff. Yet pointing this out to all appeals
courts, with evidence from the record, is for naught--the propaganda
controls.
Taking the fraud to
the Legislature, complete with evidence, amounts to "This is a real
head-scratcher" and "we can't interfere with the judiciary." Taking it to the
Attorney General, the Public-Relations Manager in Sacramento told
us we came to the right place, made copies of key portions of our paperwork, and
told us their office would investigate the matter and get back to us on an
expedited basis. From that point on, all communication was completely blocked
between us and the AG's office; same thing with the Governor's office. They just
can't deal with truth! But are the People just going to walk away and shrug
their shoulders and say "Aw, shucks!"? Is that the way to see to it that our
rights are protected by our public servants? Yes, People, the
propagandists are your public servants! The People
pay for that propaganda-- in more ways than
one.
There you have
it! We'll find this whenever and wherever the People meet up with the
enemy --the Establishment surrounding the judiciary. Now we're finding it in the
election campaign and voting process-- even to the point of criminal
conduct on the part of the executive and legislative branches of the South
Dakota government rallying to the protection of the judicial branch.
See ample documentary evidence in JNJ dated Nov. 19th, titled "J.A.I.L. Didn't Lose, It Wasn't Honestly Presented to the
Voters."
Despite the
propaganda --the only tool available to the enemy-- J.A.I.L. will continue to
provide the truth and support it with evidence. As pointed out in the
above-titled JNJ, the key provision of the amendment states:
2. Immunity. No immunity
shall extend to any judge of this State for any deliberate violation of law,
fraud or conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate
disregard of material facts, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking of a
lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of
South Dakota or the United States, notwithstanding Common Law, or any other
contrary statute.
As can be seen, that provision lists VIOLATIONS which are
subject to J.A.I.L. scrutiny. There is nothing about DECISIONS. If it can be
extrapolated by any stretch of the imagination that the above paragraph
implies "decisions" made by the judge to proceed with those acts in
violation of law, it is the VIOLATION itself
that is of concern, not the DECISION to commit the VIOLATION. (See Parable of the Left-Hand
Turn). In truth, a "decision" to violate the law is not a decision in
legal contemplation, since there is no jurisdiction to make such a "decision."
No "decision" can be reached until all legal procedures are first properly
followed in order to arrive at a "decision" at the conclusion of the
case. J.A.I.L. deals only with the procedural phase --not with "decisions."
Again, we see a pattern
here, regarding the false application of the term "decision." The Rooker-Feldman
doctrine says that a litigant may not file a federal complaint based on a "state
court decision" because the federal court may not interfere with the finality of
decisions of state courts. That makes sense if the term "decision" was properly
applied. Usually a case is brought to federal court under Title 42 because of
procedural violations in state court, such as a violation of due process,
which is a federal violation. Procedural VIOLATIONS do not involve DECISIONS in
state court --yet plaintiffs are routinely closed out from a federal remedy on
the false basis of the state matter amounting to a "state court DECISION." Even
the federal courts flee to the propaganda that plaintiffs are assailing "state
court decisions" they "don't like." The word VIOLATION is not in their
vocabulary and is always switched to DECISION when the subject-matter deals with
judicial misconduct.
We have arrived at the next
chapter in the life of J.A.I.L. --learning how to recognize and deal with the
propaganda of the enemy to keep the judiciary "independent" of the People
(remember that rant "judicial independence"?) --that is to keep them
unaccountable to the People. That's another line of propaganda: the
judiciary is "already accountable." The question is, to whom? If the
judiciary is "accountable" only to their cronies and not to the
People, IT ISN'T ACCOUNTABLE AT ALL! Remember that the next time
around!
Contribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA
91603
JAIL is
powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
"..it does not
require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to
set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a
thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root." -- Henry David
Thoreau
Return To JNJ 2006
Return To JNJ Library Index for All Years