Clarification About
The Special Grand
Jury
Below is my response to one of our readers which will
be helpful for everyone in understanding the composition and role of the Special
Grand Jury in the J.A.I.L. process. If any of you have further questions or
comments, let us know. Please do not compare the J.A.I.L. process to any
governmental operation. -Barbie
Mr. Gauger:
Your first sentence states: The SGJ members have been and no doubt will be and are
untrustworthy due to pressures, buy outs, threats, etc.
Let me ask you, did you read the J.A.I.L. Initiative
before making that statement? The reason I ask is because your statement
regarding the SGJ and comparing it with a trial jury in the system, when he got a jury trial, the ignorant,
brainwashed, pressured sheeple of the jury found him guilty of phony made up
charges has nothing to do with
facts. The Special Grand Jury of J.A.I.L. cannot be remotely compared to any
jury in the current system.
Here's what the initiative states about the SGJ. (I'll
quote from the South Dakota J.A.I.L. Initiative, since that's the one currently
active in preparing to qualify for the 2006 ballot):
3. Special Grand Jury. For the purpose of
returning power to the People, there is hereby created within this State a
thirteen-member Special Grand Jury with statewide jurisdiction having power to
judge both law and fact. This body shall exist independent of statutes governing
county Grand Juries. Their responsibility shall be limited to determining, on an
objective standard, whether any civil lawsuit against a judge would be frivolous
or harassing, or fall within the exclusion of immunity as set forth in paragraph
2, and whether there is probable cause of criminal conduct by the judge
complained against.
Since it refers to paragraph 2, I'll quote that
paragraph as well:
2. Immunity. No immunity shall extend to any
judge of this State for any deliberate violation of law, fraud or conspiracy,
intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate disregard of material
facts, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking of a lawful conclusion of a
case, or any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of South Dakota or the
United States, notwithstanding Common Law, or any other contrary
statute.
The first thing to note about the SGJ is that it isn't
a trial jury-- J.A.I.L. doesn't try anyone. Its function is limited to
determining whether a judge is entitled to immunity or should be subject to a
jury trial for alleged violation(s) of law, like any other defendant. Also,
the SGJ may determine whether there is probable cause of criminal conduct by a
judge complained of. In neither event does the SGJ determine guilt or
innocence.
In determining whether or not immunity would apply to a
judge, the SGJ is guided by paragraph 2 which describes the particular
violations for which the judge may be held accountable at a subsequent trial
should the complainant thereafter elect to sue the particular judge as a
separate case not involving the J.A.I.L. process. Of course, any judge involved
in any such subsequent trial that violates the law described in paragraph 2 may
likewise be subject to scrutiny by the SGJ if a complaint is filed
therefor.
It is important to note that the SGJ "shall exist
independent of statutes governing county Grand Juries." (�3). The Special Grand
Jury shall be truly autonomous and independent of government control. The same
cannot be said of any jury, grand or petit, operating in the system. Those
juries, controlled by government, are indeed subject to corruption, as you
mention below. Please also note that "[t]hose not eligible for Special Grand
Jury service shall include elected and appointed officials, members of the State
Bar, judges (active or retired), judicial, prosecutorial and law enforcement
personnel,...." (�12).
Regarding your further comments: two
constitutions, corporate U.S., bankruptcy, etc., I stated before (see below),
and I repeat:
Judges can make these arguments when they come
before the Special Grand Jury and the SGJ can determine whether it will fly. The
Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and J.A.I.L. will resurrect it.
Judges take an oath to uphold the Constitution-- not the UCC
code.
Now is not the time to make those arguments. When
J.A.I.L. becomes functional, all judicial defense arguments will be
thoroughly examined by the SGJ and any research staff they retain to determine
their legitimacy, lawfulness and authority. Fraud, deception, and
conspiracy will not be acceptable.
I encourage you, and everyone, to re-read the JNJ
"To Enforce the Constitution" dated October 23, 2004,
regarding the basis on which J.A.I.L. will operate. If you would like us to send
you a copy, let us know.
In closing, I say this: Even if the judicial system
worked perfectly and the Special Grand Jury never had to act because no
complaints were filed against a judge (quite a hypothetical), the
People still need J.A.I.L. in place to ensure that we maintain our
Constitutional Republic. The People have too much at stake to not
have that assurance. We're not given that assurance by any commissions on
judicial conduct or any other governmental agency.
-Barbie-
ACIC, National J.A.I.L. Admin.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2022 8:26
PM
Subject: Re: "Mr. Judge, Take Down Those
Portraits!"
Barbie - The SGJ members have been and no doubt
will be and are untrustworthy due to pressures, buy outs, threats, etc. Dave
Hinckson in Idaho had law suits going against the Dist. att. and a Judge.
The swat team broke into his home in middle of the night, hand
cuffed him, had him sit outside in the winter in the cold and broke up
the place even though he offered them keys, etc. He was held in county jail
without being charged for over a year. Guess what? I understand that when he
got a jury trial, the ignorant, brainwashed, pressured sheeple of the jury
found him guilty of phony made up charges and he was expert on the
CON-situation and law. Do you understand that the U.S.A. is a private
CORPORATION AND IS BANKRUPT! The judges took an "oath" to observe
the Constitution, but which Constitution? Do you assume that they mean the
Constitution that supposedly this country is founded upon, or that their
"oath" may be to the private bankrupt USA CORPORATION
CON-situation? Did you ever check this out? Why not check this out
with Big Al who is one of the premiere Christian researchers in the nation. We
are unable to learn anything about Dave Hinckson, where he is, how he is, etc.
Do you have any info on him? gatr
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2022 10:36
PM
Subject: Re: "Mr. Judge, Take Down
Those Portraits!"
Judges can make these arguments when they come
before the Special Grand Jury and the SGJ can determine whether it will fly.
The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and J.A.I.L. will resurrect
it. Judges take an oath to uphold the Constitution-- not the UCC
code.
-Barbie
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 12:52
PM
Subject: Re: "Mr. Judge, Take Down
Those Portraits!"
Ron - The CON-situation is a dead horse. The
current Law is the Uniform Commercial Code, (U.C.C.) the old law of
merchants, the governments, both state and federal are "Corporations"
that are BANKRUPT! These "Corporations" are DEBTORS to
the CREDITORS who control the activities of these
"Government" entities and the flesh and blood people employed by these
"entities" that carry on the functions. If not already connected suggest
you get on the address book of American Patriot researcher [email protected] and visa versa.
gatr