GO AHEAD. SUE ME!! I look forward to the day I can face you ALL in court. I will bring all your friends as witnesses, and in front of a lawful jury we will explore who the real criminals are. I only hope to face you before some other parasite blows up the world either working for "the Word" or fighting it. Until my case is resolved and a couple real criminals face justice, I have no trust, respect or confidence in any of you for very good reason. Either help resolve it or I will make a fool of you all. READ MY CASE or ignore it and stay guilty.

Dear Judge John C. Irby, Judge Scott Griffith, and Krista Andrews of Child Support
 In regards to Civil case NO. 09-04-c-0595

You dismiss my request for review? Because someone involved wasn't notified? Just who wasn't? I have e-mailed my requests to several public officials in North Dakota, some are listed below. Everything I have sent you people I sent out to a news group site. If you want to refresh your memory, get back to me for the link. It will be entered as evidence.

 

Just because I plain do not understand all your legal games, I do know right from wrong and I have been wronged. You will allow this massive theft because of your rules? I have hit a brick wall trying to communicate with any one of you. I want answers. I have been stolen from, kidnapped, falsely imprisoned , extorted from, and lied to. I have spent countless hours researching and I trust a jury, NOT YOU. I don't even know how many kangaroo courts I have been in and was never more than tricked out of my money. Is that All law is the smoothest liar? You people take almost 50% of what we earn and this is the respect we receive?

 

I wish to present to a jury the facts. The system you have built is designed with you in mind, but it is failing --I believe at all of North Dakota people's expense. I wish to prove it, and you wish to jail me for it? I feel all you people forgot just who your boss really is. I have been wronged in this matter. So have thousands of others, and that is at everyone's expense.

 

You cannot sit and judge me, as you are biased by design. I am standing my ground. I have had years of plain theft and threats from you people and NEVER any kind of a trial. You went in and stole from me what I earned. Will you throw me in jail and STEAL a month of my life to really show what your legal system is all about? Are you a judge for Justice or are you in this for what you can take from the people? My only remedy is go to the people that pay you for this.

I have been ignored by you all. I have hard copy mailed and spammed the s--- out of all you people and NOT ONE RESPONSE. EVERY JUDGE WITH E-MAIL, EVERY POLICE STATION OR INDIVIDUAL OFFICER WITH E-MAIL, EVERY MEDIA SOURCE,
THE GOVERNERS, MAYORS AND ALL OFFICIALS I COULD FIND, VIRTUALLY EVERY OFFICIAL IN NORTH DAKOTA I HAVE CONTACTED AT LEAST ONCE.

Our choice in your system is to pay you or go to jail as a deadbeat? I am not trapped in your illusions like thousands of others. I am not conned by your propaganda and lies. I know the truth. You cannot help anyone by stealing from them, and that is all you do. Now, you want to throw me in jail and have the mom and everyone in North Dakota support me to propagate your destructive illusions?

 

FINALLY, Wrong choice, I had a choice, so did she. I could have forced her to have an abortion, forced her into an adoption or, like others, kill her for choosing to be a mother. I can argue many points of the legality of this whole system and seek your arrest. You promote and live a massive fraud. You cost the taxpayers Billions of dollars, but the bottom line is: This court is killing a growing number of people. This court is stealing billions of our tax money to build an illusion of helping the children. In reality, this agency is destroying the future of everyone in America.

 

You slander millions of people with the coin words "dead beats." Men have no say past the sexual act. You people are misleading, living off, imprisoning, and destroying a whole nation with propaganda that is not based on the truth but a goal of building Government. Without Government we all would be living like millionaires. Everyone would be producing. This whole concept of Government is the WHOLE ILLUSION THAT WILL DESTROY THIS PLANET.

 

I am no criminal. You demand 18+ years of servitude for a woman's choice causing hate and anger while taking our pay for it. You push the illusion you care but in reality, you do it for Federal dollars. Your propaganda is making sex a crime. Instead of wars, killing, or treason to the Constitution which you all do knowingly and willingly. Your propaganda is making "dead beats" public enemies instead of yourselves. You have loaded up the prison system, destroyed countless families, and damaged millions of lives for Federal dollars and hold no accountability for your actions.

 

We are forced to support the parents in jail so you get the money. You destroy people's future as they are forced to just survive enough to pay their bill or go to jail. How does anything you do benefit anyone but your system? You say the State has a "compelling interest" in the welfare of children. This is fraud, because the State simply "presumes" that authority, without any procedural due process - no hearing, no evidence, nothing. It is called "procedural fraud." This is a felony and you know it.

In Civil Law, a "contract", "debt" or "obligation" is set forth in writing, but not in the Civil "Family Law" system. You won't show a contract, and in fact refuse to discuss it. The US Supreme Court clearly states that a "hidden contract is an abhorrent in law." Case law says "an ability to pay" must be demonstrated before the penalties of incarceration can be applied. This government program is the most destructive, debilitating and even deadly ever devised by our "public servants."

 

Both the State and Federal courts duly uphold that there must be proof "beyond a reasonable doubt" that this alleged contempt was a "willful disobedience" of the court's order; and further, that the burden of that proof is on the prosecution to show that "an ability to pay" exists, but was willfully disobeyed. In Family Law, "pay up of go to jail" is enforced almost universally: No hearing, no evidence needed?

 

Approximately 25,000 men committed suicide last year. While we do not know the exact reasons why, because they are not here to tell us, we do know that 80% of them were "recently involved" in a Family Court case. That, on average, is almost 400 men for every State. We can't even begin to estimate that price tag, except, to say, that none of them are paying taxes anymore or helping the kids.

 

I refuse to make the mother and my child support me because I can't support them. You have the power, SHOOT ME! Show the only real power you have. I have a goal of eliminating the entire child support system and know it would save the taxpayer at least 100 billion dollars every year, not to mention lives. It might also just save our society. This is what I seek to help the kids and mothers, smashing your propaganda and exposing the real criminals who deserve prison. With the money saved, life would be better for all. I, Ed Curtis am in preparation to defend my freedom, my wallet, and All of North Dakota from charges against me filed by you that will send me to prison.

Dear child service provider; Please send complete records of all Ashley Stettner's case records to me at the above address. I seek test results, application forms, cumulative scholastic records, enrollment records, health records, and any other information concerning my daughter are also requested. Please include grades of all subjects to date. If the grading system is in the least unusual, please include an interpretation. Also please include all "shot" records, vaccination records, and immunization records, insurance records, counselor's reports, accident reports, incident reports, enrollment cards and report cards. You are also requested to include all records of or involving psychological counseling, testing, etc. In addition, please send me copies of all "developmental evaluation", psychological and psychiatric evaluations, test results and reports, Division of Youth and Family Services (DYFS) reports. Division of Social Services reports, home studies, custody evaluations, copies of any and all requests received from any source concerning Ashley as well as any other documents, reports, correspondence and the like in her file. Please send copies of all documents related to or in connection with any case worker or social worker investigation, interviews, etc. I also request that I receive copies of all notices and material sent to the custodial parent.

I also request that copies of all of the aforementioned type of reports, etc. that become available as Ashley progresses through the system be sent to me as they become part of her record or are available.

As you are most likely aware, being a professional administration profession, Federal Law requires that I be furnished all of the above information. Your attention is directed to The Family Educational Rights and Privacy act (FERPA), Public Law 93-380, Title 20, USCA Section 1232(g), et. seq. and Title 93-568 et seq. As you also know, and your local school board lawyer will be glad to confirm and verify this for you, Federal Law requires that this information, files, papers, documents, etc. cannot be kept from me and must be released to either parent if requested. This is a formal written request, pursuant to the above cited FERPA.

In the event any of the above requested reports or information is legitimately confidential by law, and not allowed to be released to me, I request that the rest of this request be considered separately, and an itemized list of the redacted items be included. I would also seek to have my Bill of Particulars answered in this matter before I face you in court.  I am defending myself from your department. To me, it will be a life sentence. I will never give you anything because it is the right thing to do for Ashley's future.

Sincerely,

Ed Curtis

---------------------------------------------------------------

EDWARD D. CURTIS, ALLEGED DEFENDANT
 
Case No. (1-2-1?) BILL OF PARTICULARS Date:(1- 21-05) e- Mail# 1-1000

Krista Andrews and 150 partners

Judges: ALL
 
FIRST REQUEST FOR A BILL OF PARTICULARS DIRECTED TO ALLEGED COMPLAINANT state of NORTH DAKOTA

"Request for a Bill of Particulars"; Ed Curtis respectfully requests the Prosecuting Attorney to supply answers to the following questions. I am not a lawyer and I do not understand the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings I have been forced into.

INTERROGATORIES

1. Am I entitled to a fair hearing?

2. Who has the burden of proof or burden of providing a preponderance of evidence?

3. Am I presumed innocent of every element of this alleged crime or alleged action at hand?

4. Am I supposed to be informed of the nature and cause of the charges and proceedings against me?

5. Is there evidence of a complaining party?

6. Did I violate someone's legal rights?

7. If yes, then please specify which rights I violated. When you answer these basic questions I will be in your office. In Court we will explore these questions on taxpayers' money.

Further questions asked of this court:

RESPONDENTS

Respondents in this matter factually are: 1-201

1.) , et als. (and YOUR deputies and assigns), are bonded as required by the Statute of North Dakota "An Act Concerning the Official Bonds of Officials," who is fraudulently acting in both his professional and personal capacities within the COUNTY OF CASS, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, as one of the people of NORTH DAKOTA, a citizen of state, defined in Article II Constitution of North Dakota , and specifically not welfare enumerated; in propria persona, sui juris, living on the Land within the boundaries of Cass county, in North Dakota, one of the united states of America by an act of Congress at 9 Stat. 452; with express and explicit reservation for all Unalienable, Vested Natural, Inherent, and common Law Rights, accountabilities and responsibilities whether enumerated or not in the Constitution for the state of North Dakota, is committing all acts and/or omissions in this matter as the Cass County District Attorney (a public servant) for all his acts and/or omissions in this matter, was a resident therein, and thereby comes under this court's jurisdiction.

2.) THE COUNTY OF CASS, IS an incorporation or undefined fiction who was present in the COUNTY OF CASS, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, and was acting in both its professional and personal capacities for all its acts and/or omissions in this matter, and was resident therein, (as a public servant) and thereby comes under this court's jurisdiction.

3.) The PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, was an incorporation or undefined fiction who was present in the COUNTY OF CASS, STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA, and was acting in both its professional and personal capacities for all its acts and/or omissions in this matter, (as a public servant) and was resident therein, and thereby comes under this court's jurisdiction.

4.) John and Jane Does 1 through 500 were joinder parties to this matter by act and/or omission, and either natural born, fictitious, or corporate entities, corporations, organizations, state agents, state actor, state or federal or third party agencies, not bonded as required by the Statute of NORTH DAKOTA passed February 28, 1850, "An Act Concerning the Official Bonds of Officials," and were acting in both their personal and professional capacities in this matter (as public servant(s)), and were resident or had business within the COUNTY OF CASS, STATE OF NORTH DAKTOA in this matter, and thereby come under this court's jurisdiction.

5.) All respondents are the alleged real party in interest, but are in fact, undefined and unknown entities acting under pretense and overt fraud under color of law and under color of authority who have suffered no damage whatsoever.

6.) Your petitioner, Ed Curtis, by that name and spelling only-and no other has been factually driven into indigency due to the continued, illegal and unlawful acts and/or omissions by respondents in this matter. Petitioner has been unlawfully incarcerated, kidnapped by public officials, falsely arrested without warrant on or about 11-08-04, unjustly imprisoned, and maliciously prosecuted without due process of law, over his will and against his consent and has been constantly unlawfully restrained of his liberty from that point onward, and without your petitioner having it within his power to confront his accusers at lawful trial, and without being lawfully informed of the nature and cause of the accusation against him, the venue, the jurisdiction and the real party of interest; was falsely and maliciously and unlawfully forced into a tribunal which was only held to find my guilt for no crime at law, in a court without jurisdiction; without probable cause; and prior to the alleged
hearing and without evidence presented at lawful trial.

8.) No lawful warrant did issue or was presented at any time to your petitioner by respondents in accordance with the concise rule of law, and as mandated by their oath of office. No supporting affidavits, verification, or subscription nor grand jury indictment as mandated by the concise rule of law was ever used to bring me to trial, in overt contravention to the rule of law, and over my continued objections and against my consent. No qualifying signature of Appellant/Petitioner is upon any valid or lawful instrument and/or claim held by respondents in this matter.

III

QUESTIONS PRESENTED

The following questions are relevant to the issue as to the lawfulness of the conviction from which petitioner seeks relief and reparations in the instant cases:

1.) Has the North Dakota Legislature unlawfully acquiesced or assisted in the subjection of the sovereignty of the rightful citizens of North Dakota to the municipal power of the United States Congress (found in Art. I, Sec. 8, Cl. 17, U.S. Const.) directly by its legislation, or indirectly through agencies created for that purpose, which ultimately led to the unlawful acts and/or omissions of respondents in this matter, and the resultant fraudulent conviction from which your petitioner hereby seeks relief?

2.) Can the respondents in this matter, through the COUNTY OF CASS, by their various unlawful acts and/or omissions in this matter and unclean hands, base these fraudulent acts and/or omissions based on published Penal Code � 270 "Failure to Provide" and/or � 166(a)(4) "Contempt of Court" using their positions of power under color of law, and color of authority to use the courts of the COUNTY OF CASS, as an organized crime syndicate in which to usurp your petitioner's natural born, common law, constitutional and/or civil rights?

3.) Can the respondents in this matter, through the COUNTY OF CASS, by their various unlawful acts and/or omissions in this matter and unclean hands, overcome the obligation of contract?

4.) Can the respondents in this matter, through the COUNTY OF CASS, by their various unlawful acts and/or omissions in this matter and unclean hands, overcome the obligation of contract between Child and Father and thereby force me to defend my life, liberty and property and secured liberty that: "All men are by nature free and independent and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; and pursing and obtaining safety, happiness and Justice"?

5.) Can the respondents in this matter, use an unconscionable contract, vitiated by fraud by way of inducement; null and void in ab initio, as a foundational basis to use published Penal Code � 270 and/or 166(a)(4) under color of law, under color of authority as a basis to usurp your petitioner's natural born, common law, constitutional and/or civil rights?

6.) Can the respondents in this matter, use the socialist doctrine (and/or Feminist Doctrine) "In the Best Interests of the Child" as a supporting basis in which to usurp and controvert the concise rule of law, to the detriment of your petitioner; as enumerated by the Constitution for the state of NORTH DAKOTA, and/or the Constitution for the united States?

7.) Has the STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and/or respondents in this matter violated the concise rule of law and your petitioner's natural born, common law, constitutional, and/or civil rights by derogating the concise rule of law to obtain "Title IV-D" Welfare remuneration scams and/or schemes?

8.) Can the STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA and/or respondents in this matter prosecute a matter in the courts of NORTH DAKOTA without lawful jurisdiction?

9.) Has your petitioner's foundational constitutional right to have a lawful Bill of Particulars answered as a matter of substantive due process of law in order to inform me of the nature and cause of the accusation been derogated by respondents in this matter by their insolent acts and/or omissions clothed under color of authority, under color of law in direct violation of the concise rule of law?

10.) Have respondents the lawful authority to establish a Claim of Action based upon their own unlawful acts and/or omissions in overt arrogance to the rule of law as mandated by their oaths of office and the concise rule of law as mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and the Constitution for the state of North Dakota, and the Constitution of America?

11.) Have the respondents in this matter the right to manufacture crime against your petitioner in direct violation to their oath of office, and in overt and conspired violation to the concise rule of law as defined and mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and the Constitution for the state of North Dakota?

12.) Have the respondents in this matter the right to unlawfully arrest your petitioner in direct violation to their oath of office, and in overt and conspired violation to the concise rule of law as defined and mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and the Constitution for the state of NORTH DAKOTA?

13.) Have the respondents in this matter the right to maliciously prosecute your petitioner in direct violation to their oath of office, and in overt and conspired violation to the concise rule of law as defined and mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and the Constitution for the state of NORTH DAKOTA?

14.) Have the respondents in this matter the right to falsely imprison your petitioner in direct violation to their oath of office, and in overt and conspired violation to the concise rule of law as defined and mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and the

Constitution for the state of NORTH DAKOTA?

15.) Have the respondents the enumerated authority to prosecute an action without grand jury indictment against your petitioner in direct insolence and arrogance to the respondent's oath of office, and in direct violation to the concise rule of law as enumerated and mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and the Constitution for the state of NORTH DAKOTA?

16.) Have the respondents the enumerated authority under the concise rule of law as mandated by the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791) to arrest your petitioner without a lawful warrant? Without probable cause? Not supported by affidavits? With no Governor's Warrant? In direct contravention to their oath's of office and the aforementioned concise rule of law??

17.) Has the sovereignty of the petitioner been encroached upon, abrogated, or derogated in favor of legislative powers exercised in excess of the lawful enumerated limits of the Constitution of the United States (1787-1791), and the Constitution for the state of NORTH DAKOTA?

18.) When has NORTH DAKOTA and/or respondents agreed to the foundational precepts of feminism over the concise rule of law as established and enumerated by the Constitution for the state of NORTH DAKOTA, and/or the Constitution for the united States (1787-1791) and your petitioner's natural born, common law, constitutional, and/or civil rights?

19.) When has NORTH DAKOTA and/or respondents agreed to the foundational precepts of socialism (through the embodiment of feminism) over the concise rule of law as established and enumerated by the Constitution for the United States (1787-1791) and your petitioner's natural born, common law, constitutional, and/or civil rights?

20.) Can Respondents be bought off by Federal funding; State funding, and/or third party funding(s); whose sole intent is to impress an oppression against "we the people" in order that they may get financial remunerations from or by or through direct or indirect Title 42 U.S.C. Section 651-666 "Title IV-D" welfare funding?

21.) Has the common law jurisdiction of the original NORTH DAKOTA State Constitution, which was founded upon the concise principle under Article I, Section 1 that "All men are by nature free and independent and have certain inalienable rights, among which are those of enjoying and defending life and liberty; acquiring, possessing, and protecting property; and pursing and obtaining safety and happiness," been usurped in favor of respondent's acts and/or omissions committed under color of law and under color of authority?

22.) Why have the courts of the State of NORTH DAKOTA reneged on and/or abrogated the concise rule of law, which allows a "lawful excuse" as enumerated by the legal appellation of published NORTH DAKOTA Penal Code � 270 and as mandated by the concise rule of law as enumerated in the Constitution of NORTH DAKOTA, as well as the Constitution for the United States (1787-1791)?

I will not beg for justice and will NOT sit mute to the people. Until I face a lawful jury, I will be exposing each person contacted for acts or omissions contrary to your contract of Government you signed and swore to protect for the years of terror, theft and fraud this American has suffered. From my arrest until my demands are met in full, I will be seeking justice. I demand Every cent stolen from me returned in full. I demand $200,000 from this agency for this massive fraud, and extortion ring YOU all should never have let happen. I demand your help taking North Dakota back for all our futures.

 

----- Original Message -----
From: Ed Curtis
To: Wm Herauf ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected] ; [email protected]
Sent: Wednesday, July 20, 2022 7:20 PM
Subject: Re: YOU, in silence are one of the most destructive people to N.D.( this is GONDISIZEN!)

WM HERAUF; I wanted to thank you for helping me get this hand to the people I PAY!

 

---

 

J.A.I.L.- Judicial Accountability Initiative Law - www.jail4judges.org
Contribute to J.A.I.L. at P.O. Box 207, N. Hollywood, CA 91603
See our active flash, http://www.jail4judges.org/national_001.htm
JAIL is a unique addition to our form of gov't. heretofore unrealized.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL is America's ONLY hope!
E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Get involved at [email protected]
To be added or removed, write to [email protected]
 
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless
minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
 
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the root."                         -- Henry David Thoreau    <><

Return To JHS 2005-2006

HOME
South Dakota Vote Fraud
Responses to Articles and Shows	FAQS	Join J.A.I.L.	Donate To J.A.I.L.	Buy A J.A.I.L. T Shirt
State and Federal Sites	Black Collar Crime	J.A.I.L. News Journal	Judicial Horror Stories	Branson's Legal Briefs
Contact National J.A.I.L.	Animated Introduction	Spread The Word	J.A.I.L. Constitution & By Laws	Mission Statement
J.A.I.L. Cannot Give Legal Advice	Website Comments	Current Events	Links Of Common Interest	Yahoo Group