Ron
Branson responds:
Nancy Lazaryan,
here is what is Constitutionally wanting in relation to the issues you have
pointed out above. First off, every state's Constitution must set forth the
supremacy of the U.S. Constitution, no if, ands, or buts. If it were otherwise,
such "state" would not be a state among the fifty states consisting of the
United States of America. The wording in each state's Constitution must
be similar to that we have here in California, "The State of
California is an inseparable part of the United States of America, and the
United States Constitution is the supreme law of the land." Art. III, Sec. 1.
There are only
two classes of crimes recognized in the Constitution, and that is "high crimes
and misdemeanors." One can only be charged criminally with either a high crime
or a misdemeanor, never infractions. There is no such thing as infractions.
Infractions are but the figment of one's imagination, and were it so
that any of the fifty states instituted such a thing as infractions,
it would have to found to be Constitutionally infirm because it denies federally
protected due process rights such as the right to Probable Cause, Assistance of
Counsel, and to a Jury Trial.
If indeed it were
so that either the judiciary, or the legislature obliterated the Grand Jury
powers, they would thereby deprived themselves of any possibility to
prosecute anyone of high crimes (felonies). "No person shall be held to answer
for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime (felony) unless on a presentment or
indictment of a grand jury..." Such persons charged with a felony must be
presented by the prosecution to a Grand Jury for an indictment, and without such
indictment, the accused charged with a felony cannot even be held to
answer, much less be tried and found guilty.
If the charge is
one of a high crime, then a Grand Jury exclusively must determine Probable
Cause. If it be for a misdemeanor, then a magistrate may determine Probable
Cause. Hence, show me a state in which
they have done away with the safe-guard of the Grand Jury, and I will show
you a state that has no possible way of prosecuting for a felony. This
means one could become a mass murder, and no one could touch them even if the
evidence was irrefutable with ten witnesses to the same act. Not even Machine
Gun Kelly could be placed on trial for the felonies committed by him. You see,
destruction of the Grand Jury system IS the destruction
of the basic Constitutional safe-gurads in this country! Our country would
collapse! Obviously, the People of Minnesota could not "vote" to abolish the Grand
Jury system, let alone the legislature, or the
judiciary.
Now pursuant to
your testimony, here is how J.A.I.L. would cure the problem you face in
Minnesota. If any judge made a "decision" that their word superseded statute,
the Constitution, or the People in the form of Grand Jury, they would be
answerable to the Special Grand Jury on the question of whether they willfully
violated Constitutional principles. According to your testimony, they are openly
and willfully violating statute and Constitutional principles. If only thirteen
of the twenty-five citizens found thusly as you have declared, they would lose
their cloak of judicial immunity and could be tried on the merits of their crime
and/or offenses. Not only would they have to perform restitution, but face
possible prison time, and/ or lose their judgeship alone with half their
retirement.
It would only
take a couple incidents of judges' heads rolling after which the judges would
recognize that indeed the People have all their rights protected by the
Constitution. All governments would have to recognize that the Grand Juries are
the People, and they would be forced to tuck their tails between their legs and
high tail it.
Finnally, let me
say, you are appropriately barking up the right tree when you beat at the door
of the Grand Jury. You just lack the key to open that door. In
complimenting you, I wish to commend you for pursuing the right path. Every
other patriot cause no matter what, who are beating at the door
of freedom in a way that does not involve the Grand Jury system,
is spinning their wheels, and shall never see their effort come to
fruition.
The fact is,
never will this country be restored to its founding principles without the key
to the Grand Jury system of JAIL4Judges! Not Minnesota, not any other
state, nor this country. The fact is that God has raised me up for the purpose
of writing J.A.I.L. and leading this nation, but not through election
to office. Who elected Noah? Abraham? Moses? David? John the
Baptist? Apostle Paul? John the Revelator? No one! "So then it is not
of him that willeth, nor of him that runneth, but of God that sheweth mercy."
Romans 9:16.
God bless
you.
- Ron
Branson
Why
Access to Grand Juries
Are Being Blocked
By Ron Branson - J.A.I.L. CIC
Nancy Lazaryan, I have read of your below frustration, and I need
to bring something to your attention regarding Grand Juries. Back in 1960 the
State of California created what has now become known as the Commission on
Judicial Performance (CJP). This commissions have spread throughout the other
49 states as a "means" of discipling wayward judges.
In creating the CJP the "work" of the Grand Juries was "transferred" to
the CJP. Prior to the creation of the CJP Grand Juries had the power to
investigate all political figures. However, since then, the one and only
governmental entity that cannot now be investigated by the Grand Jury is the
judiciary.
I filed an affidavit for criminal conduct of a certain judge with the
Los Angeles County Grand Jury. I thereafter received a letter from the Grand
Jury stating that they did not have jurisdiction over the matter, and that I
would have to go to the Commission on Judicial
Performance.
Indeed I did go personally to San Francisco, and was told that they are
not a prosecuting agency, but deal only with ethical matters, and that I would
have to go to the State Attorney General's Office. I drove from S.F. to the
State Attorney General's Office in Sacramento where I was told they I would
have to go to S.F. to the CJP. I told them that I just came from them
and they sent me here.
Eventually they allowed me to see a Virgil Chapman, their P.R. man, who
photocopied my evidence and told me that this evidence needs to be acted upon
post haste.
After a passage of time hearing nothing, I called to follow up. They
made unmistaken acts to block my calls and told me they could no do
anything.
Here is what I found out. The State Attorney General is defense counsel
for the California judges, and could not prosecute. Bottom line, there exists
no forum in which the People may file a criminal affidavit against a judge
which may be investigated.
This is why you cannot gain access to the Grand Jury. It is also why I
wrote into the J.A.I.L. Initiative that the Special Grand Jury created by the
Initiative shall not be subject to the laws imposed upon Grand Juries.
J.A.I.L. returns the power back into the hands of the People in the form of a
Special Grand Jury.
- Ron Branson
The following News Release was
just sent to various media sources (newspaper, internet, TV and
radio).
Feel free to post on your own
website and/or send around to your contacts...
Minnesota Citizens demand access
to the GRAND
JURY
In a FULL PAGE ad in the Sunday May 25, 2022 St.
Paul Pioneer Press the Citizens of the state of Minnesota demanded access to
the Grand Jury�.
BREAKING
NEWS
St. Paul,
Minnesota
May 25, 2022
The Citizens of Minnesota, frustrated by
their attempts to bring evidence of the corruption of certain judicial
officers to their Grand Juries, placed a full-page ad in the St. Paul Pioneer
Press on Sunday, May 25, 2008.
The Grand Jury is composed of Citizens and
is required to investigate evidence of corruption of political officials. But in Minnesota, the Judicial Branch
has taken over the Grand Juries and has refused to allow the Grand Juries to
hear the evidence that would indict their fellow judges of
crimes.
The cover-up is deep and wide.
In the summer of 2007 Citizens demanded to
the Chief Judge of the Ramsey County district court (Gregg Johnson), access to
the Grand Jury to bring evidence of corruption of public officials. The judge refused.
In November of 2007 an indictment came
down from the Grand Jury of Ramsey County on a murder investigation. The indictment was signed by the
foreperson of the Grand Jury. A
criminal complaint (and evidence) of only one, of over 40 cases was sent to
the Grand Jury foreperson. The
foreperson, confused, sent the information to Chuck Balck of the Ramsey County
attorney's office. Balck gave the information to Chief Judge Gregg
Johnson. Johnson buried
it.
Undaunted, numerous Citizens petitioned
the Governor (Tim Pawlenty) and the Minnesota Attorney General (Lori Swanson)
seeking a special Grand Jury to be convened. Pawlenty and Swanson ignored the
Citizens.
The Citizens arrived at the state capital with
TV cameras and asked to speak with Pawlenty and Swanson concerning their
petition for a Grand Jury to be convened. Instead of responding to the
Citizens, the state police were called and threatened the Citizens with
arrest, and the police grabbed the equipment of the reporters.
LINKS to videos:
Part 2
The Citizens also petitioned both the
Minnesota Court of Appeals and the Minnesota Supreme Court seeking a writ of
mandamus to compel access to the Grand Juries. No
response.
Now, a private Citizen has funded a
full-page ad in the St. Paul Pioneer Press. This man is not wealthy, yet he
dug into his own pockets to bring the message to the People of the state of
Minnesota. "We want out GRAND JURY to investigate the evidence of corruption
in the judicial branch."
When will the People understand that it is
OUR responsibility to correct OUR government? The Grand Jury is charged with
the duty to investigate ALL evidence of corruption of public officials,
including the judges.
The Citizens of the state of Minnesota
will not stand down. They will be heard, and they will require that ALL public
officials are made accountable to the People.
It is the right of the People to bring
evidence of corruption directly to the Grand Jury. We demand our rightful
access to the Grand Jury.
Nancy Lazaryan, Citizen of the state of
Minnesota
Robert
Zick, Producer Inside Insight Newshour