J.A.I.L. News Journal
______________________________________________________
Los Angeles, California January 21, 2023
______________________________________________________
The Inherent Right of ALL People to Alter
or Reform Abusive Government
The Right Upon Which All Other Rights
Depend
The Torchbearer for J.A.I.L. Nationally - Support Them!
P.O. Box 412, Tea, S.D. 57064 - (605)
231-1418
J.A.I.L. Is
Very Simple
and Very
Limited
NO JUDGE WILL BE SUBJECT TO
SUIT
IF THE
JUDGE FOLLOWS
THE LAW
1. J.A.I.L. is limited to when it
may act
"[N]o complaint of misconduct shall
be considered by the Special Grand Jury unless the complainant shall have first
attempted to exhaust all judicial remedies available in this State within the
immediately preceding six-month period." �11.
This provision shows that J.A.I.L. will not interfere
with the system. The People will allow the system to work as it should, all the
way through to final exhaustion of all available judicial remedies. It is not
the intention of J.A.I.L. to disrupt the regular operation of the established
judicial function. J.A.I.L. will in no way undermine the operation of the
judicial system.
J.A.I.L. will have no jurisdiction to act until the
system is entirely finished with a case, through all possible appeals, reviews,
and other available proceedings in the final state court (or review by the U.S.
Supreme Court if that option is taken) that can take remedial action. It is
only after the system has done everything it intends to do to provide a remedy
that a complaint may be filed with the Special Grand Jury for its
examination.
There are two exceptions to the "exhaustion"
requirement which are set forth in paragraphs 17 (Criminal Procedures) and 22
(Challenges to this Amendment).
�17: "In addition to
any other provisions of this Amendment, a complaint for criminal conduct against
a judge may be brought directly to the Special Grand Jury, when all of the
following conditions have been met: (1) an affidavit or declaration of criminal
conduct has been lodged with the appropriate prosecutorial entity within ninety
days of the commission of the alleged crime; (2) the prosecutor declines to
prosecute, or one hundred twenty days has passed following the lodging of such
affidavit or declaration, and prosecution has not commenced; (3) an indictment,
if sought, has not been specifically declined on the merits by a county Grand
Jury; and (4) the criminal statute of limitations has not run. ..."
Here again, before J.A.I.L. has jurisdiction to examine
a criminal matter, the People allow ample time for the system to work first,
before the Special Grand Jury may act. J.A.I.L. neither disrupts nor
undermines the prosecutorial operations of the system. Only after the system
fails to act does J.A.I.L. become involved, and not before.
�22: "No judge under the
jurisdiction of the Special Grand Jury, or potentially affected by the outcome
of a challenge [to this Amendment], shall have any jurisdiction to sit in
judgment of such challenge. Such pretended adjudication shall be null and void
for all purposes and a complaint for such misconduct may be brought at any time,
without charge, before the Special Grand Jury by class action, or by any
adversely affected person."
Of course, no exhaustion requirement is needed
regarding any challenges to the J.A.I.L. Amendment as specified.
In summary, J.A.I.L. is limited
to participate only after the system allegedly fails to provide a remedy
for the People under its own prescribed processes and
procedures.
2. J.A.I.L. is limited to what it may
act upon
Only any of the following alleged violations will
trigger J.A.I.L. action: (See �2)
- Any deliberate violation of law
- Fraud or conspiracy
- Intentional violation of due process of
law
- Deliberate disregard of material facts
- Judicial acts without jurisdiction
- Blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case
- Any deliberate violation of the Constitutions of South
Dakota or the United States
Only for any of those seven strict violations of
procedure, and no others, will judges be subject to civil suit without the
shield of judicial immunity, i.e., judges will be held accountable only for
any acts involving those seven procedural violations. Those seven
violations are ways in which judges refuse to provide a judicial remedy to
which the People are entitled by law.
Please note that it has nothing to do with "liking" or
"not liking" a decision-- it is strictly a matter of
law! Accordingly, J.A.I.L. will
enhance the "independence of the judiciary" by forcing
judges to rule pursuant to law and not in response to
pressure from individuals, or from the system.
Put in another light, ask yourselves the
following questions:
- Should a judge be allowed to deliberately violate the
law with impunity?
- Should a judge be allowed to commit fraud or
conspiracy with impunity?
- Should a judge be allowed to intentionally violate due
process of law with impunity?
- Should a judge be allowed to disregard material facts
of a case with impunity?
- Should a judge be allowed to commit judicial acts
without jurisdiction with impunity?
- Should a judge be allowed to block a lawful conclusion
of a case, i.e., commit any act that impedes such a conclusion, including but
not limited to, unreasonable delay and willful rendering of an unlawful or
void judgment or order, with impunity?
- Should a judge be allowed to deliberately violate the
Constitutions of South Dakota or the United States with
impunity?
The only ones who would answer "yes" to any of those
questions are the tyrants themselves, and tyrant-sympathizers. For more than a
century, judges have been allowed to do all of the above with
impunity. The tyrants and their sympathizers refer to this
as "settled law in the United States" which J.A.I.L. "will overturn."
The only thing J.A.I.L. will overturn is
TYRANNY!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The People's rights are violated every day in courts
across this nation. South Dakota is no exception. Under what the
tyrant-sympathizers refer to as "settled law in the United States" judges are
allowed to commit the violations listed above with impunity because of the
routine abuse of judicial immunity which blocks the People's right to redress of
grievances, and thus denies them the judicial remedy to which they are entitled
as a matter of law. This practice amounts to nothing less than tyranny and
despotism.
Yes, the century of "settled law in the United States"
claimed by the tyrant-sympathizers (whether the legislators, lawyers, the Bar
Association, or anyone else so inclined) is TYRANNY--
pure and not-so-simple. That is what the People of
South Dakota want overturned through J.A.I.L. It is their
right-- it is their duty to do so!
PLEASE BE SO
ADVISED!
-Barbie-
Ron Branson
Author/Founder