It's the MEANS of
J.A.I.L. That Sets It Apart
By Barbie, ACIC, National J.A.I.L. Administration
On October 23, 2004, I wrote a JNJ titled "To Enforce The Constitution" with the subtitle: J.A.I.L. -
the only means providing a spelled-out mechanism for the People to do so. I encourage
everyone to read, or re-read, that article. It'll provide much insight to what I
say here. To that end, I repeat a couple of paragraphs that I stated in that
Journal, to wit,
Although we have often said that
the objective of J.A.I.L. is judicial accountability -i.e., We the People
holding judges accountable to themselves under the standards set forth in the
United States Constitution-we have, over time, become more enlightened to the
fact that the ultimate objective is To Enforce The
Constitution by holding judges accountable to the
People under its standards. And to drive home the fact that "J.A.I.L. is the
ONLY answer" to accomplishing that objective, J.A.I.L. is the ONLY proposal
available providing a detailed, spelled-out method and process designed for the
People to do so.
More and more people are
realizing that the objective must be the enforcement of the Constitution by the
People, however no one beyond J.A.I.L. has come up with the specific means by
which to accomplish that task. Despite all other ideas, none offers an
alternative to J.A.I.L. No, not one! Regardless of what
others have suggested as a solution, all are inherently dependent upon the
implementation of J.A.I.L. to stand guard in
keeping government within the
bounds it was designed to function. Yes, government must be leashed by
the People, and that leash must be held firmly by the People on an
instant and permanent
basis to maintain our Constitutional Republic. Only
J.A.I.L. provides such leash!
I cited Thomas Jefferson at
To say
that our rights are protected by the Constitution is to rely on a piece of paper
if we ignore the control of the powers of government exerted by the people. It
is the people who are the ultimate guardians of the Constitution and the rights
it guarantees... A constitution alone cannot control government without republican forms, i.e., mechanisms that keep control of their representatives in the people's hands.
I don't know if our readers just don't read our
Journals or what, but we still have too many writing to
us and asking why J.A.I.L. can't join with them, form a coalition, etc. "After
all" they say, "we're seeking the same goal of judicial accountability." But,
people, that alone isn't enough. What must be considered is the
means by which judicial accountability is sought. As I said a year
ago, we have, over time, become more enlightened to the fact
that the ultimate objective is To Enforce The
Constitution by holding judges accountable to the
People...
We have established that the means by
which to achieve judicial accountability is through enforcement of
the Constitution by the People. However, people, even THAT is not enough! If we
know that (1) it's the People who must act, and
(2) it's the Constitution that must be enforced--
we are still left with the question of HOW is that to
be accomplished? As Thomas Jefferson stated long ago: A constitution alone cannot control government without
republican forms, i.e., mechanisms that keep control of their representatives in
the people's hands.
That tells us that we need "mechanisms" in place to
"keep control of their representatives [i.e., the
judiciary in the instance of J.A.I.L.] in the people's
hands." And as reported in my previous Journal (see above) J.A.I.L. is the ONLY proposal available providing a detailed,
spelled-out method and process designed for the People to do so.
So the "What," "Who,"
and "How" are now answered. We already know
"Why" (because of judicial tyranny), and
"When" (as soon as the People do what is necessary to pass it
into law-- like what's now being done in South Dakota).
J.A.I.L. is complete in and of
itself. It needs no other groups or coalitions to perfect its
program. In fact, any "joining in" with other groups will only
detract from the focus on J.A.I.L.'s complete program,
already fully established in writing. All that is needed now is for the People
to get the measure passed in each of their states. Again, the concentration with
J.A.I.L. is on FOCUS, not detractions. All of us must focus on
getting J.A.I.L. passed in each state, beginning with South Dakota in
2006!
(See our note below).
All it takes is a reading of the initiative to show
that J.A.I.L. is not involved in the court system, but is activated after all
court processes have been exhausted through all appeals. Only after that point
is J.A.I.L. authorized to act in any particular case. "Oh, I'm 100% in favor
of J.A.I.L., but-but-but can't J.A.I.L. help us while we wait
for it to pass?" Is there a provision in the J.A.I.L. initiative that
allows this organization to help people fighting in the system? I
don't find any. Do you?
One last note: As far as Ron and I personally are
concerned, we have a conflict of interest with the system. After our 18-year
battle, we conscientiously object to the system as evil and corrupt and
realize that J.A.I.L. is the ONLY answer. That's where our attention and focus
has to be!
We need everyone's help in South Dakota, with
donations, collecting signatures, and spreading the word any way you can. The
signature gathering campaign is currently under way until the beginning of
November-- about two weeks away. We are encouraged by the progress made so far
and urge everyone to participate in this cause. Please go to www.sd-jail4judges.org
for details and information. Call the SDJA office at (605) 231-1418 for
immediate contact. We thank all of you who have already helped and those who are
actively working so hard in coordinating this effort.
REMEMBER-- A WIN
IN SOUTH DAKOTA
IS A WIN FOR EVERY AMERICAN!