No Liberty-Friendly
Courts
...as long as the majority of the people feel safe and
secure
in the system, they will not vote to change it.
Therefore, each election cycle adds another link
to the chain that shackles the people's liberties.
-- Adrian Banks
The following article was written almost
three years ago, and since its writing, two more links to the "chain that
shackles the People's liberties" have been added. Will we add yet another link
to that chain in 2006 by failing to pass J.A.I.L. in at least one
state? The writing we have seen "on the wall" in just this past six
months, revealing Acts that have been passed by de
facto "government" in the name of "national security" should be
enough to convince the People that the time for restoring our liberties is
extremely limited, and I'm afraid they will be lost forever if we allow another
election cycle to go by without the passage of J.A.I.L.
-Barbie-
The below article appears on the website shown, posted
by New York JAILer, Mark R. Ferran BSEE scl JD mcl
[email protected]
In a message dated 6/15/02 10:08:19
AM Eastern Daylight Time, Restoreliberty writes:
The Supreme Court of Mammon
By Adrian
Banks
June 15, 2022
Anyone who takes the time to study the rulings
of the United States Supreme Court can see that today's court is not the same
as the supreme court of, say, a century ago. The older rulings were more
liberty friendly. A century ago, people had confidence that the courts would
uphold their rights that their Constitution secured them, and the rulings of
that time proved this. No so today. Today's courts, from the supreme court on
down, show little if any regard for people's constitutional rights. Myself,
like many other people who have filed suits in the various state and federal
courts for rights violations have found out this bitter truth the hard way.
Some of us have even had sanctions imposed against us for filing suits that
the courts deemed to be "frivolous." Our rights have become frivolous things
in the eyes of today's judges. [See, for example: http://www.law.emory.edu/1circuit/may2000/99-1675.01a.html ]
I knew there had to be a period in history where
something happened that changed the courts into anti-liberty courts. I found
it during the period of our history known as the "New Deal" of the 1930's.
Roosevelt and his administration massively expanded the size and power of the
federal executive. His administration was able to usurp legislative powers,
something the supreme court unanimously ruled in 1935 was unconstitutional.
Today, Congress writes only about 10% of the laws it votes on. About 90% of
all laws are written outside the halls of Congress by Executive bureaucrats
and then a congressional representative "sponsors" the legislation. It doesn't
take a genius to see that de facto government begets de facto judges.
As the justices of the
supreme court died and retired in the 1930's, Roosevelt completely
restructured the supreme court by appointing new justices who were pledged,
not to uphold the Constitution, but to create whatever fictions were necessary
to uphold unconstitutional practices. These justices knew that the
Constitution was being violated and that their oath to support the
Constitution was a lie. The people overwhelmingly re-elected the very
political forces that were destroying the philosophy of government that
respected their constitutional rights, and every election cycle today merely
keeps these anti-liberty forces in power.
There are no liberty
friendly justices on the bench today. In fact, a recent newspaper article
pointed out that "The nine Supreme Court justices are richer than all
but a small percentage of Americans, with at least five millionaires among
them."
So you have found the truth,
and now you expect justice from the Supreme Court of Mammon. Once again, money
and power controls the system, and this leaves the common working folks out in
the cold.
The only way to get truth and justice back in the system
would be to throw the money changers out of the temple. But, as long as the
majority of the people feel safe and secure in the system, they will not vote
to change it. Therefore, each election cycle adds another link to the chain
that shackles the people's liberties.
Dead, are the judges who used to
respect the people's constitutional rights. In the eyes of today's judges it
is your duty to accept the system, the Constitution
notwithstanding.
Yours in Liberty
Adrian C. Banks
www.restoreliberty.com
www.abolitionistsociety.com
Please Forward, or Post/Archive