Even If The System
Worked,
J.A.I.L. Is Still
Absolutely Necessary
J.A.I.L. does NOT
change the system-- it provides new guards for the People's future
security as
dictated in the Declaration of Independence as governments become despotic.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, February 21, 2023 8:37 PM
Subject: Re: Will Government Fix The Broken Judicial
System?
Ron,
The reason the concept of J.A.I.L. is so
foreign to most people is simple. Most people believe the system
works. And, they believe the only ones who are complaining about it are
those who have an unjustified gripe against the system, i.e., convicted
criminals and others, who most people believe are getting their just
punishment. The public will not rally around what they perceive to be sour
grapes.
In order for reform movements to succeed,
enough people have to be affected. Even though many have run the gauntlet
of the judicial system, they are brainwashed into thinking it works, even when
they are treated poorly. They are conditioned to think it is their actions
that cause them to be treated in such a manner, not the actions of
a patently corrupt judiciary comprised of judges and their attorney
whores.
The bottom line is that most people see
the system working, so they presume it is working constitutionally. They
have no desire to change what they presume is working in a legal
fashion. And they will fight those of us who want to change that
system. Our greatest opponents are not the judges and the lawyers.
Our greatest opponents are the people themselves.
Morgan West
Westcliffe, Colorado
J.A.I.L.'s Response:
(by Barbie)
Thank you, Morgan, for
your comments. The reason the concept of J.A.I.L. is so foreign to most
people is
because "most people" are deceived about what J.A.I.L.
is about. Even if most people believe the system works, they still need J.A.I.L. in place in
order to assure it continues to work, and more
importantly-- that it works PROPERLY under
constitutional standards. The fact that most people see the system working, does not justify the
PRESUMPTION therefore
that it is working constitutionally. Therein lies the danger to the future of the People's lives-- we cannot leave the constitutional protection of our inherent rights --indeed to Life itself-- to mere Presumption.
Our natural rights,
endowed by our Creator, are the most cherished possessions we have. They are
priceless! Are "most people" thinking responsibly when leaving
the integrity of our public trust (government), into whose hands our very
lives are entrusted, to just the
Presumption
that it will remain
honorable to everyone, or even to "most people" for an indefinite period of
time? Do "most people" leave their doors unlocked, and their valuables
vulnerable, presuming that their possessions won't be stolen? Oh! but
that's "society" which cannot be trusted-- we can always trust "the system" to
work honestly, according to "most people."
The problem with "most
people" is that they are unable to think beyond themselves. If only "some
people" had their rights confiscated by "the system," is it right to
presume that they are those who have an unjustified gripe against the system,
i.e., convicted criminals, who most people believe are getting their just
punishment? Is it right to presume that convicted criminals
received the process that was due under the law and that accordingly their
punishment is just?
The "system" is the
public trust for ALL people, not just "most" people. When it comes to our "life,
liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," if those properties are unjustly taken
from only "some people," then it is the duty of "most people" to think
responsibly and not just leave "some people" vulnerable under the
presumption that the "system works."
The time will come when
"most people" who believe the "system works" and thereby
presume that "it works constitutionally" will live to
regret their apathy and wish they had the good sense to realize the value of
J.A.I.L.
Yes, "WE HAVE MET THE ENEMY AND HE IS US." Quote from Walt Kelly, the foreword to The Pogo Papers, Copyright 1952-53
Finally, "My people are
destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge, I will
also reject thee..." Hosea 4: 6
To be added or removed, write to
[email protected]
"..it does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless
minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.." - Samuel
Adams
"There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one
who is
striking at the
root."
-- Henry David Thoreau <><
Return To JNJ 2005
To JNJ Library Index for All Years