J.A.I.L. News Journal
______________________________________________________
Los Angeles, California April 25, 2007
______________________________________________________
The Battle
Lines are Drawn: J.A.I.L.
versus The Foreign Power
A Power Foreign
to Our Constitution
J.A.I.L. or Anarchy?
It's Up to The People
By
Barbie, ACIC National J.A.I.L.
J.A.I.L. is an offer, not a
mandate.
Despite the fact that Mr.
Branson sees J.A.I.L. as God's answer for
the People in these days of despotism, he publicly states that J.A.I.L. is but only God's offer to
the People of this country, not a
mandate. Whether or not J.A.I.L. is received
and put into practice is entirely up to the People. J.A.I.L. is designed
as the "consent of the People" to hold the judiciary, and hence all of
government, accountable to them under strict constitutional standards specifying
seven procedural violations in particular, to wit: (1) any deliberate violation
of law; (2) fraud or conspiracy; (3) intentional violation of due process of
law; (4) deliberate disregard of material allegations; (5) judicial acts without
jurisdiction; (6) blocking of a lawful conclusion of a case; and (7) any
deliberate violation of the Constitutions of the state or the United States. See
�2 of the J.A.I.L. Amendment.
J.A.I.L. relies on the fact that government is
instituted by the People to protect their property consisting of
their God-given inherent, inborn
rights; and that it derives its just powers from the consent of the People,
as confirmed in our Founding Document, the Declaration of Independence. J.A.I.L.
is based on the premise that each of the above seven specified violations by
judges, as defined in the Amendment, violates --fails to protect-- the
People's inherent rights, hence, is destructive of the role of government which
fails to exercise its just powers as consented by the People. J.A.I.L. stands for the principle that a violation of
just one individual's rights is a violation of the rights of the People
generally, of society as a whole; that the rights even of People who have never
sought redress of grievances are nevertheless violated
daily in our courts across this beloved
country. Therefore, J.A.I.L. is offered to the People as a means
by which they may renew their consent to effect the proper role of government
and diminish further violation of their rights. It's left purely to the People to accept or reject this
offer.
That choice rests upon the People's right to
vote.
The
People's vote determines our survival as an ordered society. Without it, society
will degenerate into anarchy. That's why the question: "J.A.I.L., or
Anarchy?" The answer to that question depends on the People preserving
their right to vote.
The vote is
the "voice of the People" especially regarding
their government-- it's the means of giving its consent to
government. When the Declaration says it is the duty of the People to throw off
such government, meaning the power in control by abuses and usurpation and
reducing the People under absolute despotism (in other words, a counterfeit
government), isn't that done by the voting process? The state Constitutions of
the initiative states acknowledge that the People have the right to alter or
amend their forms of government as they deem necessary. Isn't that done by the
initiative, passed by the voting process?
The People
(the governed) giving its consent to government is a right-- that's the way
government is supposed to operate, by consent of the governed. That has to be
done by their vote. Rights are not created by constitutions. They exist
despite constitutions, even without constitutions. I see the
right to vote as a natural inherent right of the People, as a necessary means to
express their consent for government. That's how J.A.I.L. will become a reality,
by the People amending their state Constitution in a manner they deem necessary
by voting for it, state by state. The right to vote
necessarily includes the right to vote intelligently-- the right to be informed
of the issues to be voted on without interference
by any power or influence. The right to vote in South Dakota was
interfered with by the counterfeit government that should have been thrown off
by the People of South Dakota last
November, and new guards established (J.A.I.L.) for their future
security.
This raises the question, which I asked
Ron, how can a counterfeit government, that should be thrown off by
the People as their duty to do, actually INTERFERE with the People's duty to
throw it off? Clearly, we are living under tyranny, whether
the People as a whole realize it or not. All it will take is enough
People who are informed of this truth, and the truth about
J.A.I.L., to throw off the counterfeit government by voting for
J.A.I.L. which will provide the new guard for their future security as the
Declaration instructs us. That's how
close we are, and the enemy knows it. That's why they're so scared of J.A.I.L.
and are doing anything and everything imaginable, through fraud, lies, and
deceit, to defeat it. The People must
rise above these shenanigans. It's up to them to do so if they wish to accept the
offer of J.A.I.L.
I asked Ron,
"What if there aren't enough People knowledgeable to accomplish this duty?" and
he said that the only alternative to tyranny (the status quo), without the
J.A.I.L. solution, would by nature lead to anarchy." I have to agree with that
conclusion. The choice is J.A.I.L. or
Anarchy-- which will it be?
Have the People gained any knowledge since the South Dakota
election fiasco?
Probably the most significant fact that has been exposed by the South
Dakota fiasco is that the state is run by a foreign power, not government. We
have a number of J.A.I.L. News Journals reporting on that evidence. One of them
is
J.A.I.L. Has Exposed the Foreign Power Running South
Dakota
J.A.I.L. will always have a purpose For The
People
South
Dakota was the pioneer state for
J.A.I.L. in which the People qualified the Amendment for their ballot in 2006. To get a
measure passed by the People requires the basic right to vote without
interference by any power, civil or military. (SD Const. Art.VII �1). Little did
we know or suspect that the Power running South Dakota would interfere
with the election process, resulting in a "Show-Election." "Show-Election" in South Dakota 2006,
resulting in the annihilation of the People's right to reform their government
(SD Const. Art.VI �26) and their right to a
fair election (SD Const. Art.VII
�1).
I
closed that JNJ with the following questions:
"What happens when the constitutional remedy to
reform government by the People is blocked by the very government sought to
be reformed?" Based on what we have learned above, the answer rests
on the fact that we're dealing with a FOREIGN POWER. That foreign power is not
bound by either the United
States nor the South Dakota Constitution. There is no
"constitutional remedy to reform government" under that power. So the question
might be rephrased:
"What happens when a foreign power that has
taken over control in this country prevents the People from exercising their
inherent rights?"
The answer to my previous
question, "What happens when a foreign power that has taken over control in this
country prevents the People from exercising their inherent rights?" is that
the People must decide what method of change is required "to throw off
such government, and to provide new guards for their future security." One thing
we know: Change is necessary; change will happen. The Laws of Nature will demand
it. Being under the control of a Foreign Power is not in accordance with the state of
nature, and it cannot remain that way by Nature.
To decide what method of change is
required, the People must first determine if change is necessary, and if
so, determine "the nature of the power in control," as I stated
in that same JNJ:
In order for the People to be able to exercise their
rights to reform government and to vote, they must first know what kind of
entity is controlling those processes that can block those rights. We're
referring specifically to getting J.A.I.L. passed by lawful means. J.A.I.L. is still the only remedy for the
People. The People will have to determine, based on evidence, the
nature of the power in control in order to decide what method is
necessary to carry out the mandate set forth in the Declaration of Independence:
"But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same
object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their
right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards
for their future security." (Id.)
We have received objection from a few of
our readers to our usage of the term "foreign power" saying that most people
won't understand it, that it's above most people's heads, etc. It's high time
they DO understand it for the sake of this country! That's exactly WHY we are
reporting on it, with plenty of evidence to substantiate it. Since the South
Dakota election fiasco, we have changed the motto in our heading to: "The
Battle Lines are Drawn: J.A.I.L. versus The Foreign Power. A Power Foreign
to Our Constitution."
Whatever it is called, we are
referring to the power that must be thrown off by the People, described in the
Declaration as one that manifests "a long train of abuses and usurpations,
pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce [the People]
under absolute despotism." It could be referred to as a "counterfeit
government," but use of the word "government" at all misses the point that
we have no government whatsoever which we have
substantiated by the writings of John Locke in his Second Treatise on
Government. Government ceases when it ceases to protect the People's rights.
People's rights being routinely violated by the power in control is, by
definition, not of government, but of a foreign power-- a power foreign to our
Constitution that has reduced the People under absolute
despotism.
The dissolution of government,
according to Locke, results in anarchy. See
"Will J.A.I.L. Lead to
Anarchy?" 2/10/06
Anarchy happens when "there is no longer the administration of
justice for the securing of men's rights, nor any remaining power within the
community to direct the force, [i.e., no provision by which the People can
enforce the Constitution] or provide for the necessities of the public"
resulting in the absence of government and the people becoming "a confused
multitude, without order or connexion."
Anarchy results from the effectual dissolution of government by its failure and
refusal to protect the People's rights. The Second Treatise of Civil Government (1690) by John
Locke, at Chapter XIX "Of the Dissolution of Government" Sec. 218. http://www.constitution.org/jl/2ndtr19.htm
When the government has ceased protecting the rights of the
People and thereby has ceased to exist as government, the People are at liberty
to provide for themselves by reforming and restoring government to what it was
meant to be when originally instituted for their safety and happiness. (supra) Sec. 220.
John Locke, known as the
"Philosopher of Freedom" had the greatest influence on our Declaration of Independence. "Government,
according to John Locke, will lose its right to exercise its power, however,
when government abuses its people worse than any imaginable group of marauders
that might be operating in the absence of a government. ... Further, in
Lockean theory, if government abuses the
exercise of the power given it by the people, why then, the people have a
natural right to rebel, as did the people
of New England in 1776." The Theory of Government, By Peter Landry.
http://www.blupete.com/Literature/Essays/BluePete/Government.htm
Conclusion
I stated above that all that was necessary for the
possibility of passing J.A.I.L. was that the People become knowledgeable of the
fact that we have a foreign power (a counterfeit government) in control in this
country and must rise above the fraud, lies, and deceit used by the foreign
power to defeat J.A.I.L. The People must understand that the only thing
sustaining the foreign power is the ignorance of the People, nothing else.
No matter how much money and other resources is pumped into the enemy propaganda
machine, the People can overcome it by acting on the knowledge of
truth.
However, some of our readers have expressed doubt
that we'll be able to pass J.A.I.L. by the vote, since the People are not
in control of the voting process. Joseph Stalin said "He who votes decides
nothing; he who counts the votes decides everything"
which brings the
question,Who is counting the votes? We were told that in South Dakota on
election night, the percentage results (89% against, and 11% in favor of
J.A.I.L.) did not change or vary all evening, from about 7:30 p.m. to about 11
p.m. Up until election day, J.A.I.L. was on top. Suddenly the bottom
dropped out in one day. So it's the counting or tabulating of the
votes that is the crucial factor in the voting process. Clearly, there is a
conflict of interest in having the counterfeit government, that is to be thrown
off by the People through their vote, count that vote!
In California, there is a maxim of jurisprudence that
states "The law never requires impossibilities." (Civil Code �3531). If that's
true, the law must
provide that a neutral entity be delegated the
responsibility of counting the votes. If we can't rely on
the vote to throw off a despotic government, the result will be throwing it
off by anarchy which, by nature, will eventually lead to the establishment of a
new government. Nevertheless, at some
point, an honest voting process will have to be established for the People to
keep a new government in check, i.e., "to provide new guards for their future
security."
J.A.I.L. (Judicial Accountability
Initiative Law) www.jail4judges.org
To be automatically added to future
mailings, place the word Subscribe in the subject line and
email to [email protected]
We are a ministry in great need of your
financial support. Please donate to this important
work at "J.A.I.L." P.O.
Box 207, North Hollywood, CA 91603
J.A.I.L. is a unique addition to our
Constitution heretofore unrealized.
JAIL is powerful! JAIL is dynamic! JAIL
is America's ONLY hope!
E-Group sign on at http://groups.yahoo.com/group/jail4judges/join
Visit our active flash -
http://www.jail4judges.org/Flash.htm
* *
*
He has combined with others to subject
us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our
laws; giving his assent to their acts of pretended legislation.
- Declaration of Independence
"..it does not require a
majority to prevail, but rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush
fires in people's minds.." - Samuel Adams
"There are a
thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is
striking at the root."
-- Henry David
Thoreau
<><
Return To JNJ 2007
Return To JNJ Library Index for All Years