J.A.I.L. News Journal
______________________________________________________
Los Angeles,
California
March 5, 2023
______________________________________________________
The Inherent Right of ALL People to Alter or
Reform Their Government.
The Right Upon Which All Other Rights Depend.
__________________________________________________
Mission
Statement
JNJ
Library
Federal
J.A.I.L.
FAQs
What?MeWarden?
______________________________________________________
www.sd-jail4judges.org
Rogue Miscreant
Legislators
Who is Innocent
and Not Conflicted?
The day before
yesterday, March 3, 2006, we published a J.A.I.L. News Journal
entitled, "Rogue Miscreant Cops," the Los Angeles Times newspaper
article by Scott Glover being entitled, "3 More Arrested in Rogue
Cop Robberies."
Having read the fist
five paragraphs of this article, it dawned upon us that all one had
to do was substitute all 105 Legislators in South
Dakota for the criminals cops in paragraphs four and five, and
all fits very well.
To refresh your
memory of the context of the first five paragraphs of that article,
we reprint it word for word just as written in the next paragraph
followed by an adaptation of paragraphs four and five to the
criminal Legislators of South Dakota:
"Nineteen people, including five former
police officers, have been criminally charged in connection with a
string of daring and sometimes violent robberies in Southern
California, which were staged to look like law enforcement raids as
the suspects used police badges and equipment to fool victims,
federal authorities said Thursday.
Though the scope of the nearly five-year investigation was first
made public in 2004, new details emerged with the arrests this week
of a California prison guard � taken into custody Thursday � and of
former Los Angeles and Long Beach police officers. Three other
suspects remain at large, authorities said.
The group committed more than 20 robberies and burglaries in Los
Angeles and neighboring communities over a span of 2 1/2 years
until its ringleader, a Los Angeles police officer, was arrested in
2001 on drug charges.
"What makes this case so disturbing is that the defendants include
five sworn law enforcement officers who abused their badges, their
uniforms and their oaths of office to engage in criminal conduct
under the pretense of conducting real police operations," said
Thomas O'Brien, head of the criminal division for the U.S.
attorney's office in Los Angeles. "While this story sounds like a
script from 'The Shield' or 'Training Day,' it actually
happened."
Los Angeles Police Chief William J. Bratton focused his comments on
the three former LAPD officers who allegedly were part of the crew.
The officers, he said, "are traitors to the badge that the men and
women of this department so proudly wear, traitors to their fellow
officers and, most importantly, traitors to the public."
Now for an adaptation of paragraphs
four and five above to South Dakota's criminal
Legislators:
"What makes this case so disturbing is
that the defendants include all one-hundred and five sworn State
Legislators who abused their offices, their public
trust, and their oaths of office to engage in criminal conduct
under the pretense of conducting real legislative operations," said
Ron Branson, head of National J.A.I.L. "While this
story sounds like a script from 'The Shield' or 'Training Day,' it
actually happened."
Ron Branson focused his comments on all one-hundred and five
South Dakota State Legislators who were part of the crew. These
Legislators, he said, "are traitors to their offices
of legislation, and traitors to everyone in South Dakota
government, and most importantly, traitors to the
public."
Most of you are uninformed that a formal NOTICE
has already been sent via U.S. Mail to all one-hundred and five
State Legislators throughout South Dakota asking them to cease and
desist from their unlawful acts, and to apologize to everyone in
South Dakota. We could not send that U.S. Mail via internet to
everyone on this list because it is fourteen pages in length,
and would require an attachment, which we hesitate to do. Below
is a few paragraphs from that formal NOTICE.
"Thus we must hereby inform you and put you on NOTICE that
your proposed Resolution, and your subsequent vote on that
Resolution, were clearly unlawful acts by taking sides in an
election contest in an attempt to control and influence
the vote on Amendment "E", in clear violation of South Dakota
Constitution, Article VI, section 19 - Free and Equal
Elections-Right of Suffrage and Article VII, section 1 - Right
to Vote, as well as South Dakota Attorney General's Official
Opinion No. 88-28 - Expenditure of Public funds on Election
Issues. Further,
that your unlawful acts are also violations of fundamental
rights secured by the United States Constitution. ....
Gentlemen, this is exactly what Amendment "E" and our
actions have done here and continue to do. However, to the contrary, your
actions fly in the face of Art. VI, sec. 27, show contempt
for the People and Constitution of South Dakota, and make a
mockery of justice, moderation, temperance, frugality and
virtue. Your actions
here have irrefutably proven our motto, "Reform never comes from
government, it must always come from the
People."
Fourth, Art. VI, sec. 19 - Free and equal elections -
Right of suffrage - Soldier voting, in pertinent part
states:
"Elections shall be free and equal, and
no power, civil or military, shall at any time
interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of
suffrage. �"
Gentlemen, what part of the word "free" don't you
understand? What part
of the words "no power" don't you understand? What part of the word
"civil" don't you understand? What part of the word
"interfere" don't you understand? Your HCR 1004 blatantly states in
its first and last paragraphs:
"A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION, Urging the voters of
South Dakota to reject the Judicial Accountability Initiated
Law (J.A.I..L.) which will be submitted to South Dakota voters in
November 2006, designated Amendment E.
* * *
"NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the House of
Representatives Eighty-first Legislature of the State of South
Dakota, the Senate concurring therein, that the South Dakota
Legislature strongly urges all South Dakota voters to
protect our citizen boards, to protect our system of justice, to
protect economic development, to protect all our citizens from
frivolous lawsuits that would be authorized by the Judicial
Accountability Initiated Law, and to vote against Amendment
E.href="style="mso-footnote-id: ftn1"
mid://00009561/#_ftn1" name=_ftnref1>
Urging the voters of South Dakota to reject? Strongly urges all South Dakota
Voters � to vote against Amendment E? Your actions fly in the face of
Art VI, sec, 19, and thus again you show contempt for the People of
South Dakota and the South Dakota Constitution. Equally, Art. VII, sec. 1 - Right
to vote, in full states the same as Art. VI, sec.19
above. Gentlemen, why
do you fail to show respect for and honor to the People of South
Dakota and the sacred right of suffrage, the right to
vote?
Gentlemen, your actions also fly directly in the face and
authority of our own South Dakota Attorney General's Official
Opinion No. 88-28 - Expenditure of Public Funds on Election
Issues, issued June 29, 1988, ....
As such, we hereby formally request that you
promptly, individually, and collectively (the entire House
and Senate) reconsider your vote, and formally and publicly
withdraw HCR 1004. We
further formally request, that you publicly (in newspapers,
radio, television and on official websites) apologize to the
citizens of the State of South Dakota, for using your offices and
public funds to - interfere to prevent the free exercise of the
PUBLIC's right of suffrage (to vote), either for or against
Amendment "E". We
request that this action on your part be taken and accomplished
promptly, no later than March 10, 2006, so as to quickly
stop and mitigate the damage you have wrought to a free and equal
election process.
Besides being blatantly in violation
of the law and your oaths of office to follow the law, your actions
smack of an imperial arrogance, an abuse of your office and power
(loaned to you by the People), a fundamental failure to understand
that you are servants of the People and of an outright contempt for
the People you represent. ....
What's more, these South Dakota Legislators
have violated clear statutory South Dakota law, to wit,
"
Publication of false or erroneous information on
constitutional amendment or submitted question as misdemeanor.
Any person knowingly printing, publishing, or delivering to any
voter of this state a document containing any purported
constitutional amendment, question, law, or measure to be submitted
to the voters at any election, in which such constitutional
amendment, question, law, or measure is misstated, erroneously
printed, or by which false or misleading information is given to the
voters, is guilty of a Class 2 misdemeanor."
Simply put, this statute provides that every
South Dakota Legislator in the this instance of Amendment E is
subject to arrest, detention for trial before a jury
on the evidence, conviction, and sentencing
to incarceration.
There exists several options here, which
we do not now wish to enumerate. However, should you wish
to offer recommendations as to how this statewide conspiracy and
criminal scandel should be handled, we will be glad to consider
your recomendations. Please know that the potential for conflicts of
interest involved here are extremely staggering, and raises the
question of who is innocent and who is not conflicted? This is the
thing that media frenzies are made up of, and is bound to
draw the attention of the entire nation as something heretofore
unheard of in the possibilities of an entire state legislature
being arrested.