J.A.I.L. News
Journal
______________________________________________________
Los Angeles,
California
January 21,
2006
______________________________________________________
The Inherent Right of ALL People to
Alter or Reform Abusive Government
The Right Upon Which All Other
Rights Depend
The Torchbearer for J.A.I.L.
Nationally - Support Them!
P.O. Box 412, Tea, S.D. 57064
- (605) 231-1418
J.A.I.L. Is
Very Simple
and
Very Limited
NO JUDGE WILL BE SUBJECT
TO SUIT
IF THE
JUDGE FOLLOWS
THE LAW
1. J.A.I.L. is
limited to when it may act
"[N]o complaint of
misconduct shall be considered by the Special Grand Jury unless the
complainant shall have first attempted to exhaust all judicial remedies
available in this State within the immediately preceding six-month
period." �11.
This provision shows that J.A.I.L. will
not interfere with the system. The People will allow the system to work
as it should, all the way through to final exhaustion of all available
judicial remedies. It is not the intention of J.A.I.L. to disrupt the
regular operation of the established judicial function. J.A.I.L. will in
no way undermine the operation of the judicial
system.
J.A.I.L. will have no jurisdiction to act
until the system is entirely finished with a case, through all possible
appeals, reviews, and other available proceedings in the final state
court (or review by the U.S. Supreme Court if that option is taken)
that can take remedial action. It is only after the system has done
everything it intends to do to provide a remedy that a complaint may
be filed with the Special Grand Jury for its
examination.
There are two exceptions to the
"exhaustion" requirement which are set forth in paragraphs 17 (Criminal
Procedures) and 22 (Challenges to this
Amendment).
�17: "In addition to any other provisions of this Amendment, a
complaint for criminal conduct against a judge may be brought directly to
the Special Grand Jury, when all of the following conditions have been
met: (1) an affidavit or declaration of criminal conduct has been lodged
with the appropriate prosecutorial entity within ninety days of the
commission of the alleged crime; (2) the prosecutor declines to
prosecute, or one hundred twenty days has passed following the lodging of
such affidavit or declaration, and prosecution has not commenced; (3) an
indictment, if sought, has not been specifically declined on the merits
by a county Grand Jury; and (4) the criminal statute of limitations has
not run. ..."
Here again, before J.A.I.L. has
jurisdiction to examine a criminal matter, the People allow ample time
for the system to work first, before the Special Grand Jury may act.
J.A.I.L. neither disrupts nor undermines the prosecutorial
operations of the system. Only after the system fails to act does
J.A.I.L. become involved, and not before.
�22: "No
judge under the jurisdiction of the Special Grand Jury, or potentially
affected by the outcome of a challenge [to this Amendment], shall have
any jurisdiction to sit in judgment of such challenge. Such pretended
adjudication shall be null and void for all purposes and a complaint for
such misconduct may be brought at any time, without charge, before the
Special Grand Jury by class action, or by any adversely affected
person."
Of course, no exhaustion requirement is
needed regarding any challenges to the J.A.I.L. Amendment as
specified.
In summary, J.A.I.L. is
limited to participate only after the system allegedly fails to
provide a remedy for the People under its own prescribed processes
and procedures.
2. J.A.I.L. is limited
to what it may act upon
Only any of the following alleged
violations will trigger J.A.I.L. action: (See
�2)
-
Any deliberate violation of
law
-
Fraud or
conspiracy
-
Intentional violation of due process of
law
-
Deliberate disregard of material
facts
-
Judicial acts without
jurisdiction
-
Blocking of a lawful conclusion of a
case
-
Any deliberate violation of the
Constitutions of South Dakota or the United
States
Only for any of those seven strict
violations of procedure, and no others, will judges be subject to civil
suit without the shield of judicial immunity, i.e., judges will be held
accountable only for any acts involving those seven procedural
violations. Those seven violations are ways in which judges refuse
to provide a judicial remedy to which the People are entitled by
law.
Please note that it has nothing to do
with "liking" or "not liking" a decision-- it is strictly a
matter of law! Accordingly, J.A.I.L. will
enhance the "independence of the judiciary" by
forcing judges to rule pursuant to law and not
in response to pressure from individuals, or from the
system.
Put in another light, ask yourselves the
following questions:
-
Should a judge be allowed to
deliberately violate the law with impunity?
-
Should a judge be allowed to commit
fraud or conspiracy with impunity?
-
Should a judge be allowed to
intentionally violate due process of law with
impunity?
-
Should a judge be allowed to disregard
material facts of a case with impunity?
-
Should a judge be allowed to commit
judicial acts without jurisdiction with
impunity?
-
Should a judge be allowed to block a
lawful conclusion of a case, i.e., commit any act that impedes such a
conclusion, including but not limited to, unreasonable delay and
willful rendering of an unlawful or void judgment or order, with
impunity?
-
Should a judge be allowed to
deliberately violate the Constitutions of South Dakota or the United
States with impunity?
The only ones who would answer "yes" to
any of those questions are the tyrants themselves, and
tyrant-sympathizers. For more than a century, judges have been allowed to
do all of the above with impunity. The
tyrants and their sympathizers refer to this as "settled law in the
United States" which J.A.I.L. "will overturn." The only
thing J.A.I.L. will overturn is
TYRANNY!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The People's rights are violated every
day in courts across this nation. South Dakota is no exception. Under
what the tyrant-sympathizers refer to as "settled law in the United
States" judges are allowed to commit the violations listed above with
impunity because of the routine abuse of judicial immunity which blocks
the People's right to redress of grievances, and thus denies them the
judicial remedy to which they are entitled as a matter of law. This
practice amounts to nothing less than tyranny and
despotism.
Yes, the century of "settled law in the
United States" claimed by the tyrant-sympathizers (whether the
legislators, lawyers, the Bar Association, or anyone else so inclined) is
TYRANNY-- pure and not-so-simple.
That is what the People of South Dakota want
overturned through J.A.I.L. It is their right-- it is
their duty to do so!
PLEASE BE SO
ADVISED!
-Barbie-
Ron
Branson
Author/Founder