Clarification
About
The Special Grand
Jury
Below is my response to one of our readers which
will be helpful for everyone in understanding the composition and role of
the Special Grand Jury in the J.A.I.L. process. If any of you have
further questions or comments, let us know. Please do not compare the
J.A.I.L. process to any governmental operation. -Barbie
Mr. Gauger:
Your first sentence states: The SGJ members have been and no doubt
will be and are untrustworthy due to pressures, buy outs, threats,
etc.
Let me ask you, did you read the J.A.I.L.
Initiative before making that statement? The reason I ask is
because your statement regarding the SGJ and comparing it with a trial
jury in the system, when he got a jury trial, the ignorant, brainwashed, pressured
sheeple of the jury found him guilty of phony made up charges has nothing to do with facts.
The Special Grand Jury of J.A.I.L. cannot be remotely compared to any
jury in the current system.
Here's what the initiative states about the SGJ.
(I'll quote from the South Dakota J.A.I.L. Initiative, since that's the
one currently active in preparing to qualify for the 2006 ballot):
3. Special Grand Jury. For the purpose of
returning power to the People, there is hereby created within this State
a thirteen-member Special Grand Jury with statewide jurisdiction having
power to judge both law and fact. This body shall exist independent of
statutes governing county Grand Juries. Their responsibility shall be
limited to determining, on an objective standard, whether any civil
lawsuit against a judge would be frivolous or harassing, or fall within
the exclusion of immunity as set forth in paragraph 2, and whether there
is probable cause of criminal conduct by the judge complained
against.
Since it refers to paragraph 2, I'll quote that
paragraph as well:
2. Immunity. No immunity shall extend to
any judge of this State for any deliberate violation of law, fraud or
conspiracy, intentional violation of due process of law, deliberate
disregard of material facts, judicial acts without jurisdiction, blocking
of a lawful conclusion of a case, or any deliberate violation of the
Constitutions of South Dakota or the United States, notwithstanding
Common Law, or any other contrary statute.
The first thing to note about the SGJ is that it
isn't a trial jury-- J.A.I.L. doesn't try anyone. Its function is limited
to determining whether a judge is entitled to immunity or should be
subject to a jury trial for alleged violation(s) of law, like any
other defendant. Also, the SGJ may determine whether there is probable
cause of criminal conduct by a judge complained of. In neither event does
the SGJ determine guilt or innocence.
In determining whether or not immunity would apply
to a judge, the SGJ is guided by paragraph 2 which describes the
particular violations for which the judge may be held accountable at a
subsequent trial should the complainant thereafter elect to sue the
particular judge as a separate case not involving the J.A.I.L. process.
Of course, any judge involved in any such subsequent trial that violates
the law described in paragraph 2 may likewise be subject to scrutiny by
the SGJ if a complaint is filed therefor.
It is important to note that the SGJ "shall exist
independent of statutes governing county Grand Juries." (�3). The Special
Grand Jury shall be truly autonomous and independent of government
control. The same cannot be said of any jury, grand or petit, operating
in the system. Those juries, controlled by government, are indeed subject
to corruption, as you mention below. Please also note that "[t]hose not
eligible for Special Grand Jury service shall include elected and
appointed officials, members of the State Bar, judges (active or
retired), judicial, prosecutorial and law enforcement personnel,...."
(�12).
Regarding your further comments: two
constitutions, corporate U.S., bankruptcy, etc., I stated before (see
below), and I repeat:
Judges can make
these arguments when they come before the Special Grand Jury and the
SGJ can determine whether it will fly. The Constitution is the Supreme
Law of the Land, and J.A.I.L. will resurrect it. Judges take an oath to
uphold the Constitution-- not the UCC code.
Now is not the time to make those arguments. When
J.A.I.L. becomes functional, all judicial defense arguments will be
thoroughly examined by the SGJ and any research staff they retain to
determine their legitimacy, lawfulness and authority. Fraud,
deception, and conspiracy will not be acceptable.
I encourage you, and everyone, to re-read the JNJ
"To Enforce the Constitution" dated October 23,
2004, regarding the basis on which J.A.I.L. will operate. If you would
like us to send you a copy, let us know.
In closing, I say this: Even if the judicial system
worked perfectly and the Special Grand Jury never had to act because no
complaints were filed against a judge (quite a hypothetical),
the People still need J.A.I.L. in place to ensure that we
maintain our Constitutional Republic. The People have too
much at stake to not have that assurance. We're not given that assurance
by any commissions on judicial conduct or any other governmental
agency.
-Barbie-
ACIC, National J.A.I.L. Admin.
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, September 05, 2022 8:26 PM
Subject: Re: "Mr. Judge, Take Down Those Portraits!"
Barbie - The SGJ members have been and no
doubt will be and are untrustworthy due to pressures, buy outs,
threats, etc. Dave Hinckson in Idaho had law suits going against
the Dist. att. and a Judge. The swat team broke into his home
in middle of the night, hand cuffed him, had him sit outside in the
winter in the cold and broke up the place even though he offered
them keys, etc. He was held in county jail without being charged for
over a year. Guess what? I understand that when he got a jury trial,
the ignorant, brainwashed, pressured sheeple of the jury found him
guilty of phony made up charges and he was expert on the CON-situation
and law. Do you understand that the U.S.A. is a private
CORPORATION AND IS BANKRUPT! The judges took an "oath" to
observe the Constitution, but which Constitution? Do you assume that
they mean the Constitution that supposedly this country is founded
upon, or that their "oath" may be to the private bankrupt
USA CORPORATION CON-situation? Did you ever
check this out? Why not check this out with Big Al who is one of the
premiere Christian researchers in the nation. We are unable to learn
anything about Dave Hinckson, where he is, how he is, etc. Do you have
any info on him? gatr
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Friday, September 02, 2022 10:36 PM
Subject: Re: "Mr. Judge, Take Down Those Portraits!"
Judges can make these arguments when they come
before the Special Grand Jury and the SGJ can determine whether it
will fly. The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, and
J.A.I.L. will resurrect it. Judges take an oath to uphold the
Constitution-- not the UCC code.
-Barbie
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Tuesday, August 30, 2022 12:52 PM
Subject: Re: "Mr. Judge, Take Down Those Portraits!"
Ron - The CON-situation is a dead
horse. The current Law is the Uniform Commercial Code, (U.C.C.)
the old law of merchants, the governments, both state and
federal are "Corporations" that are BANKRUPT! These "Corporations"
are DEBTORS to the CREDITORS
who control the activities of these "Government" entities and
the flesh and blood people employed by these "entities" that carry
on the functions. If not already connected suggest you get on the
address book of American Patriot researcher [email protected] and visa versa.
gatr