The Gravity of Judicial
Immunity
(By Ron Branson - J.A.I.L.
CIC)
Katina Kefalos:
I have no reason to doubt your sincerity. I will thus
answer your concerns re judicial immunity within your context in
red. While I regard
these answers as "my opinion," I think such descript as "opinion" under-
estimates the severity. Nonetheless, I am pleased you have accorded me with
the respect of asking my opinion.
Ron Branson
----- Original Message -----
From: Katina Kefalos
Sent: Friday, June 04, 2022 4:24 PM
Subject: inquiry
Dear Ron,
In FEB. I was released from prison after serving 21
months for civil resistance regarding federal income taxes. My saga is far
from over and I hope that you can, and will, give me your opinion on
judicial immunity.
On the surface it appears that a US District Court Judge
cannot be sued in a Bivens action, or other civil action, but I find this most
difficult to accept. (Truth is often hard to accept,
but accept it you must, and here with and exclamation. It is for
this reason that J.A.I.L. has come into existence.)
If that judge were involved in a conspiracy to deny a defendant their Sixth
Amendment right to the assistance of counsel (and the defendant went to prison
for 21 months) would he still have immunity? (Absolutely!) His involvement would certainly
be outside the scope of his judicial functions. (That does not matter. The result would be the same
on most anything short of a felony such murder or rape.)
In my case the judge conspired with my former attorney
and I am in possession of three memos, and two transcripts from two
depositions, implicating the judge in just such an extra-judicial
activity in my trial. (Welcome to the
club. These are typical day-to-day events in the life of a judge. As one
reporter told me, "Corruption in the court is not
newsworthy!")
Currently, I have a civil malpractice suit involving the attorney and
everyday it looks worse for the judge, who has perjured himself regarding his
participation. (As I say, proving the goods on a
judge is of no significance. I hold proof that a federal judge ordered a federal
magistrate to conspire with the defendants in a known clear violation the law,
and even though she even admitted it in the appellate record, she was still
covered.)
It is a Sixth Circuit case out of Columbus, OH, and
growing like a mushroom cloud. Please give me your opinion regarding liability
of a judge when he has acted extra-judicially. (Your
problem is that you are letting your common sense and logic interfere with
reality. You are thinking that two plus two is four. Well - surprise! Welcome to
the new math. Words fail to correctly depict the gravity of the situation.
Perhaps someday someone will produce of a movie where everything defies
reality in an effort to depict "justice" in our court system. Think the
worse, multiply it by three, and you might be getting
close.)
Very Truly Yours,
Katina Kefalos
PS If you want to know if I am genuine and this question authentic
perhaps you know Rich Cornforth, Ben Houck, or Roger Elvick. I know them and
they can confirm who I am, except for Roger who is currently in custody. Also, I
can give you my case number, etc.
Return To JNJ 2004
To JNJ Library Index for All Years